Well, my Conservative Party rival at the 2010 General Election, Matthew Sephton, has recently tweeted that he: "Passed a lorry on way to work today - with 'Please give blood' on it. I'd love to, but a discriminatory law prevents me from doing so!"
Under the National Blood Service's current guidelines, a homosexual is banned from donating blood if he has ever engaged in anal or oral perversion activity with another man. According to the National Blood Service, to lift the ban could result in a fivefold increase in the risk of HIV-infected blood entering the blood supply. The ban on homosexuals donating blood is an example of sensible and rightful discrimination.
Given that homosexuals are generally riddled with disease - from HIV to syphilis to hepatitis etc - as a result of their sodomitical activities, it is entirely right and proper that the National Blood Service refuses to accept their blood. It would be completely crazy for the National Blood Service to accept bad blood - but Matthew Sephton wants to force the potentially deadly consequences of his high-risk behaviour onto innocent people.
Implicit in Matthew Sephton's aforementioned tweet is the fact that the reason why he is banned from donating blood is because he has engaged in buggery, and/or licking of another man's anus and/or taking another man's penis into his mouth (and vice versa) at least once.
I'd like to see Matthew Sephton get the help he needs. Matthew Sephton is a man. As all right-thinking men know, we are sexually compatible with women - we are not sexually compatible with other men. I'd like to see Matthew Sephton accept and embrace the fact that he is a man, along with all the implications of his male gender.
I'm concerned for Matthew Sephton's welfare, just as I'm also concerned about the welfare of the young children who have day-to-day contact with Matthew Sephton in his job as a primary school teacher.
I want the best for Matthew Sephton. I want him to have a happy and healthy life. I don't want to see Matthew Sephton dying of AIDS or suffering from syphilis, and that's why I hope that he will think again about his lifestyle choices - in his own best interests.
Furthermore, in the best interests of society, I sincerely hope that Matthew Sephton won't ever become an MP whilst he remains ideologically committed to putting public health at risk, as I believe that Matthew Sephton's opposition to the blood ban demonstrates that he is not fit to hold office.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Haha, you must be trolling? Do people still really think like this?
ReplyDeleteyou're kidding right! you don't actually believe all this stuff!
ReplyDeletenot all gays are Perverts! and not all perverts are gay!
and the implication that Matthew Sephton is a danger to the kids he teaches because of his sexual preference is just down right ignorant!
People like you need to just get on with your lives and not spout this hate every time you open your mouth. What Matthew Sephton does in his free time is no concern of yours or mine or anyones!
Wow mate... i think your political career might be "buggered" after this little rant.
ReplyDeleteHaha. You're amusing.
ReplyDeleteWow... I don't know what scares me most. Your ideas or your ability to influence political decisions.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the former and hopefully you will put yourself out of the running for the latter.
You fucking wanker - there's no science or reason in your position! Screening of ACTUAL risk bearing activities is the best way to ensure the safety of the bloody supply!
ReplyDeleteYou are loathesome. I can't believe anyone this hateful is allowed any sort of position in society. I say this not to be controversial, but because I genuinely believe anyone who reads this and doesn't immediately think "what a vile attitude to have" is seriously blinkered.
ReplyDeleteYou've made me feel sick.
£20 says Richard Carvath was sporting a tiny little erection when he typed:
ReplyDelete"Buggery, and/or licking of another man's anus and/or taking another man's penis into his mouth."
Another £20 says he's just bitter that, with a face like that, he struggles to get the boys interested...
My God, that's protesting far too much. Admit, you like a little bit of finger up the arse fun when you're with some desperate whore, don't you?
ReplyDeleteIt's nice to see that pig-ignorant, frothing bigotry is not dead in the modern Tory Party!
ReplyDeleteI hope you're ashamed of yourself, you disgusting pervert.
ReplyDeleteBefore I leave any real comment can I ask is this a genuine blog entry?
ReplyDeleteYou're a dick!
ReplyDeleteI'd like to see you get the help you need!
ReplyDeleteI notice there are no comments. I guess everyone thinks you're a dick and therefore their comments don't get approval?
If I may suggest, go engage in anal perversion activity with yourself. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteIt's odd that you state that "[men] are not sexually compatible with other men", despite having listed, with curious enthusiasm, some of the various ways in which gay men prove that this is clearly not the case.
ReplyDeleteA real Christian would not refer to another human being in such an awful way.
ReplyDeleteThe Bible asks that we love our neighbour as we love ourselves, and you know.. we aren't meant to judge.
You aren't a Christian, sorry.
Whilst I defend your right to speak your mind, I feel that you are exceedingly misguided in your thinking.
ReplyDeleteI'm mixed race. My father is African. Tell me, would you accept my blood?
Is it mainly homosexuals you are scared of, or would you extend that to races other than yours?
You really are an despicable, ugly, baldy prick aren't ya?
ReplyDeleteQuite frankly, I'm more worried about the prospent of having bigots like you running the country than gay people teaching our children. Your brand of Christianity is not something I recognise, sorry. My God created all humans equal and in God's own image, including the gay ones. I hope, for the sake of our country, that you never get elected to government.
ReplyDeleteAre you taking the piss?
ReplyDeleteYOU GOOD SIR ARE A FIRST CLASS TOSSER
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely unbelievable! Totally and utterly pigheadedly bigoted in his beliefs! The amount of sexually transmitted deseases that occur among hetrosexuals, is at an all time high, and hetrosexuals are of course, the majority. It seems we will never get rid of the pigheaded crap that people spout, but there has to be a way of enabling homosexual/gay people to be able to give blood If they want to.
ReplyDeleteWow, where to begin. Homophobic and ill informing. I'm not even sure I can be bothered to break this all down and point out to Richard Carvath all his incorrect assumptions however, I will state, as a mother of four, I would have no issues with Matthew Sephton teaching my children at primary school based on the fact he is gay.
ReplyDeleteMr Carvath, could you clarify whether or not you give blood and if so what your blood type is? If, as you seem to believe, donated blood from homosexuals would be riddled with sin and filth, I'd rather not take the chance of a transfusion from you turning me into a rabid homophobe.
ReplyDeleteCheers.
You arrogant, close-minded IDIOT.
ReplyDeleteYou imply that heterosexual people never have oral or anal sex. I conclude you have not had a very interesting life.
ReplyDeleteBlood donation should be based on science. Not prejudice. Reading this blog made me feel very sad. I thought we'd made progress in recent years. Your views demonstrate how much further we have to go to get equality.
ReplyDeleteAnd your homophobic and ignorant rantings make it clear that you are not qualified to hold public office either. Douchebag.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to take great enjoyment in recounting the possible activities in which these "homosexual-perverts" (sorry, I don't understand the need for the hyphen) supposedly indulge.
ReplyDeletePS Thank God that absolutely all Heterosexual people must be immune to HIV and can give blood safely without a thought.
Please leave the twenty-first century immediately.
ReplyDeleteI don't wish to panic you but some evil, twisted, moronic bigot seems to have hacked your account and deleted all the sane things you had previously said on this subject and replaced them with a load of ignorant nonsense. I think you might want to edit it quickly before anyone else notices and comes to the conclusion that you would say anything quite so stupid or infantile.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to have an unhealthy fascination with the mechanics of gay sex. Is there something you would like to get off your chest ?
ReplyDeleteYour opposition to civil rights demonstrates that you are not fit to hold office and I hope Matthew Sephton trounces you soundly at the ballot box.
ReplyDeleteYou ignorant imbecile. How dare you pour your hate speech onto the web. You are committing as crime and are duly reported.
ReplyDeleteThat is absolute bullshit, I would say humbug but it no longer has the same meaning, the national blood service is using an archaic mentality that you seem to love. Its not in the best interest of society it removes a group of people who are willing to give blood.
ReplyDeleteYou don't want him to have a healthy life you want him to fall into line with what you decide is normal. Now please bugger off and educate yourself, leave the bible on the shelf and go and meet different people and work out what is really going on out there in the world.
Oh Richard, don't you know - when you type 'homosexual pervert'more than once it reveals a deep seated longing on your behalf to undertake the act of sharing intimates with another man. It's a shame you have to mask your feelings for your fellow man with this false mask of bigotry, but if you DO need help with coming out these fantastic groups will be more than willing to help you with your conflictions of desire.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.stonewall.org.uk/
http://outrage.org.uk/
http://www.realjock.com/gay-men/salford/salford
Possibly the most offensive and idiotic blog post I have read in years.
ReplyDeleteUneducated, narrow-minded and homophobic, these are the sort of views that make me terrified to know we have a Conservative government.
Do they discriminate at all for just talking out your arse? Because that's you knackered then isn't it...
ReplyDeleteHi Richard, is that a cold sore on your lower lip? I hope you didn't get herpes from licking another man's anus, or taking his penis in your mouth.
ReplyDeleteRichard
ReplyDeleteCan I gently suggest that - in terms of the manner of tour communications - you look closely at the lead of Jesus: who always treated people with immense dignity - regardless of their circumstances (cf John 4; John 8).
Is this the way Christians really think? I have rarely been so disgusted reading an article. Every one has a right to their opinion and everyone deserves to be protected against this kind of discrimination in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteThis unmerited hate that you're spreading is outdated and has absolutely no place in our society. I happen to be a sexually active 'homosexual pervert' myself - and guess what? I don't have HIV, Syphilis or any other STD - but I know heterosexual men that do or have had various STIs. as does anyone. You give no sources to validate your 'facts' - do homosexuals really have a significantly higher rate of sexually transmitted disease than heterosexuals?
ReplyDeleteIf you want to continue to claim to be a 'political activist' how about you try thinking about some politics rather than slandering your opponents with your disgusting lies and antique prejudices?
Please provide evidence of your claims.
ReplyDeleteYou, Mr Carvath, as a self-styled man, are not morally compatible with my country. Nonetheless I would like you to have a healthy and happy life, and I feel that might be more easily achieved if you were to move to Iran, where you will find plenty who agree with the tenor and stridency of your views.
ReplyDeleteReally? People like you still exist? Please quote the source of "According to the National Blood Service, to lift the ban could result in a fivefold increase in the risk of HIV-infected blood entering the blood supply.". Just want to make sure that is what they said...
ReplyDeleteUgh people like you with your religious views annoy me. Its not the fact you believe in what you want in your own time, you start trying to spread malicious stereotypes in what I see as a lame attempt, because you yourself believe in something that many find not true or have no proof for.
Also can you change your flag on your page if your claiming to be British. It's rather a rookie mistake. We don't all sing God Save The Queen.
You utter cunt
ReplyDeleteThere is so much wrong with this post, I don't even know where to start.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, most new HIV infections occur in heterosexuals. Young hetrosexuals. Why? Because they think hey, I'm not a homosexual-pervert! I can have all the unprotected sex I like, with however many people I want, and that's not perverted, that's normal, so I can't get HIV! Wahey!
Morons like you support that idiotic behavior. Most homosexuals I know never have unprotected sex, while the "accidental" babies seem to be getting more and more.
Is all anal and oral sex perverted, or just between two men? If I, as a heterosexual woman, give oral sex to a heterosexual man, does that make me perverted? Does that mean I have to stop giving blood?
Wow. This must be a parody of an article a Conservative would write. You can't honestly believe anything you are saying?
ReplyDeleteYou are a fucking idiot.
What are you some sort of cunt?
ReplyDeleteYou disgust me.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your opinion on menstruating women being allowed to give blood? After all, as The Holy Bible explicitly makes clear they are unclean. This could be dangerous for the rest of us if we need blood transfusions.
ReplyDeleteYou appear to have herpes. Which can be contracted through engaging in "oral perversion activity" with another man.
ReplyDeleteJust saying.
Bloody hell. Are you for real?
ReplyDeleteoh, and for that matter, how about gentiles and the 'heathens' who worship other gods. How about people with mildew in their house? Funny how many people are unclean.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, but how is discrimination ever sensible and rightful?
ReplyDeleteNo, actually, scratch that.
I am not sorry, because people like you are the reason why the world is such a cold place.
You think he should rethink his 'lifestyle choices'? Do you have a wife? Children? Someone you love?
Well, I think you should rethink loving them, because loving them makes you a pervert. That is, after all, just sensible, rightful discrimination.
NOH8 FCKH8
"According to the National Blood Service, to lift the ban could result in a fivefold increase in the risk of HIV-infected blood entering the blood supply."
ReplyDeleteCould you please link to the source of this figure of a five fold increase?
'' Given that homosexual-perverts are generally riddled with disease - from HIV to syphilis to hepatitis etc - as a result of their sodomitical activities, it is entirely right and proper that the National Blood Service refuses to accept their poisonous blood. ''
ReplyDelete'' the reason why he is banned from donating blood is because he has engaged in buggery, and/or licking of another man's anus and/or taking another man's penis into his mouth (and vice versa) at least once. ''
The lady doth protest too much, methinks
What a load of twaddle. Apart from the fact that women regularly engage in anal/oral sex with men and aren't excluded it's not as if the blood is just emptied into a vat, all blood is tested before it is made available for transfusion.
ReplyDeleteAs to the implication that a gay man is a bad role model for children I believe that a closed minded homophobe would be far worse one.
Hahahahahahaha!
ReplyDeleteOh I'm sorry, you're serious. Your post is so stupid I assumed it was a joke.
You're an idiot and a bigot and you don't know what you're talking about.
Get your head out of your arse and see the real world, you vile bigoted shit
ReplyDeleteRichard, this is one of the most disgusting and pathetic things I've ever read. Thankfully, you don't represent anyone in a political capacity, so you're only damaging your own reputation with this hateful rant. The Conservative Party was right to shun you and your vile, degenerate views.
ReplyDelete"Implicit in Matthew Sephton's aforementioned tweet is the fact that the reason why he is banned from donating blood is because he has engaged in buggery, and/or licking of another man's anus and/or taking another man's penis into his mouth (and vice versa) at least once."
ReplyDeleteHeterosexuals do these things, too. Should the rules for women be changed so that their blood is refused unless they stick solely to PIV, masturbation or abstinence? How is a male's mouth and anus any different from a woman's? There is no different risk for a man engaging in these things, than women who do. Your argument makes no sense.
I see you're a closet homosexual, then...
ReplyDeleteMethinks the Carvath doth protest too much.
Didn't I once pull you off in the toilets in Manto's?
ReplyDeleteWhat a foolish man you are. You primitive view on homosexual men is the reason why you'll be left behind in the future and it's new way of thinking. Good day to you and your small mind!
ReplyDeleteHello.
ReplyDeleteI was wondering if you had any statistics about homosexuals being 'generally riddled with disease' or if that was just an opinion?
Please tell me this is all in irony, because if it isn't, I believe the phrase "intolerant homophobic twat" might be relevant.
ReplyDeleteAnd in any case, doesn't the Nation Blood Service have to screen everyone that donates in case of blood-transmitted diseases, heart defects, low levels of iron, etc? Anyway lots of straight people get STDs too.
You may dress like a Christian but thats where the similarity ends! Your hate-filled rant is shameful, this is the 21st century not the 12th! I hope this blog haunts your "career" well into the future.
ReplyDeleteMy word, there's something very wrong with you. I don't know what Christian God you worship, but the one I grew up with was supposed to be a tolerant and loving one. Perhaps you should re-read your Bible? I think you may be mis-understanding it.
ReplyDeleteI don't imagine that you would describe your attraction to women as a "lifestyle choice". It's just an integral part of you. It is the same for Mr. Sephton, but in his case his attraction is to those of the same gender. You could not be more unjustified in calling him a pervert. Please educate yourself.
ReplyDelete"the fact that the reason why he is banned from donating blood is because he has engaged in buggery, and/or licking of another man's anus and/or taking another man's penis into his mouth (and vice versa) at least once"
ReplyDeleteDoes this mean that if a woman partakes in anal sex and/or analingus and/or fellatio that she ought to be banned from donating blood, since the diseases that can be transmitted through these acts do not differentiate between men and women?
Further to my previous point, is all donated blood not screened before it is accepted and made available for donation? If it is not, how do we know that blood donated by heterosexuals is not contaminated with diseases?
ReplyDeleteSo you want Matthew Sephton to "have a happy and healthy life" by surpressing and denying his true self. You need to rethink your close-minded, homophobic and frankly stupid position on homosexuality if you ever hope to be elected as it is *you* who is not fit to hold office.
ReplyDelete@RedmoreM
you're an asshole
ReplyDeleteYou disgust me Richard Carvath
ReplyDeleteThat is one of the most ridiculous homophobic articles I have ever had the misfortune to read. You do make valid points, that screening techniques are not reliable enough and there is too great a risk to receivers of blood to allow high risk groups to donate. Sadly, any sensible or relevant points you have made is hideously overshadowed by the attitude you've taken and the overriding tone of your article. It is, frankly, a disgrace.
ReplyDeleteHIV is not common. At all. Yes, it is more prevalent among high risk groups, ie homosexual men and IV drug users, but it is ill-advised to assume huge numbers of sexually active homosexual men are 'riddled with disease'. They are not.
Being homosexual in itself does not stop you donating blood, only sexually active homosexual men. It is not discrimination against gays, it is discrimination against high risk groups STIs which can be passed on to recipients.
It's outrageous to take the view you have on homosexuality. We live in a liberal society where it's perfectly acceptable. Get over it.
Aww bless. The repressed homosexual wrote a thing.
ReplyDeleteYou got aroused typing those gay sex acts, didn't you?
Nice herpes coldsore by the way!
I believe your opposition to removing outdated homophobic laws preventing perfectly healthy people donating blood that is ALWAYS needed puts the public health at risk more.
ReplyDeleteYou can carry diseases no matter what your sexual preference is and I'm pretty sure they run tests on all blood they take anyway, they don't just bottle it up and stick it in the first person who comes along without at least checking it first.
Of course, if you're the sort of person who lies awake at night worried that someone's going to be pumping you full of liquids from a gay man then:
a) you could always turn down any blood transfusions in the future, I'm sure no-one will mind.
b) Perhaps you're lying awake fantasising rather than worrying? Going by the detail you've gone into describing sexual acts you've obviously put a lot of thought into it.
I fully expect this comment to disappear into the ether, deleted by you rather than accepted as fair comment and published, but you'll have had to read at least some of it first. Hopefully you'll get to this part and realise you're an odious homophobic slimeball, so well done at perpetuating the Tory stereotype.
Wake up you bigot!! Judging by the look of you, you could do with a good shag you miserable excuse of a man!!!
ReplyDeleteSo does this mean women shouldn't donate either? What if I decided to "take a mans penis into my mouth"? Or are you saying it is only possible for a man to catch a disease from another man? It is uneducated bigots like yourself that are promoting senseless hatred in this world. All donor blood is screened for diseases prior to use. You 'd better hope you never get ill and need a transfusion, since apparently you're too good to acccept donations from all of us "perverts" engaging in sexual activity, gay or straight.
ReplyDeleteRichard id love to take your load in my mouth nice hot spunk then pass it over to you to swallow . I bet you was watchin a triga dvd whilst writing this i really do fancy you my sweet even though you have a dwarf dick xx lots of anal fuks and licks my sweetie x gay wayne homosexual pervert !! Yeah fuk rite of
ReplyDeleteI have literally never read such a bigoted and misinformed piece of claptrap in my entire life.
ReplyDeleteNot a shred of evidence, just anecdotal bullshit.
ReplyDeleteYou give me proof of homosexuals being riddled as you say with dease ,you ignorant bastard. If homosexuals are able to give blood they should able to just as anyone else .
ReplyDeleteDo you give blood ? there're many different races, and people who can't give blood , you don't mention them . One being pedophiles .why? they are the lowest of the low or the heroine addict that was HIV+ and who has recently has died from his illness who did"t tell my Niece you don't mention them Why? because your ignorant and narrow minded .
Not so much an activist, more a homophobic twat. However please keep writing this blog to keep me entertained, your archaic preposterous views do amuse me.
ReplyDeleteThis is completely ridiculous. To be perfectly honest, I have no idea who you are nor who Matthew Sephton is, nor do I particularly care. What I do care about is your complete ignorance and apparent aversion to homosexuals.
ReplyDeleteConsidering you are living in a country with between 3 and 4 million homosexuals in it, I am surprised by your complete lack of knowledge.
Homosexuality is not a lifestyle choice, in fact, with so many people like you in our community with your ridiculous Victorian views, there would be no one actively choosing to be homosexual if it meant they would be subjected to the scorn and disgust of such small minded people like yourself.
"I'm also concerned about the welfare of the young children who have day-to-day contact with Matthew Sephton in his job as a primary school teacher." What do you think he is going to do to them? His sexuality has absolutely nothing to do with his competence as a teacher, and despite not knowing either of you, I can safely say from what I have read, that I would be a great deal happier having a homosexual man teaching my children than a man such as you. I would not want my children being educated in such a way that teaches them to look upon homosexuals as people who 'need help' or who are in some way unequal to the rest of society.
It is a valid point that those people who fall in to high risk groups for blood-borne diseases should not give blood in case the blood screening process is not entirely successful, but you seem to have conveniently overlooked the fact that this includes prostitutes and intravenous drug users and used this as a personal attack on your political rival and to voice your narrow-minded views on homosexuality.
Your assumption that "homosexual-perverts are generally riddled with disease" is completely groundless and untrue. I would have thought that someone of a political background would be in the habit of taking care in researching a topic of discussion before voicing his opinions, but apparently you lack this basic skill. I would be interested to see the scientific papers that support your claim. I am well aware that homosexuals are in a higher risk category for blood-borne diseases, but I would simply love to see a paper with the conclusion that (to paraphrase your post) “all gays are riddled”.
You claim that “It would be completely crazy for the National Blood Service to accept bad blood - but Matthew Sephton wants to force the potentially deadly consequences of his high-risk behaviour onto innocent people.” So by your reckoning, anyone, or more specifically, any man who has a blood-borne disease is guilty of something? I don’t quite know how your mind works, and from what I’ve seen from this post, I don’t particularly want to, but I don’t know of many people who deliberately set out to catch diseases. People get diseases from not understanding the risks of certain behaviours, and that is down purely to education. No matter how much you and your other homophobic companions are against it, homosexuality is a part of our community and has been for thousands of years. It is real and it isn’t going anywhere. As a politician, it should be your concern, not that homosexuals exist in our community, but that some people, homosexual or not, still aren’t receiving the appropriate education to protect them against disease. You only have to look around any college in England to find hundreds of students, male and female, gay or straight, who are unaware of the risks of unprotected sex. Might I suggest doing something about that rather than spouting such an enormous load of poisonous, prejudiced crap.
It appears you are behind the times with your views. It might be helpful if you could keep up with our changing community or I’m afraid you’ll be getting left behind.
I'd like to see you get the help you need.
In conclusion, I believe that it is your opposition to homosexuality that demonstrates that you are not fit to hold office.
Rebecca Russell
For someone who's so concerned with Mr Sephton's welfare, you certainly like to pass derision upon his lifestyle. But let's comment on your piece, shall we. The fact that you seem to adhere to the myth of homosexuality = AIDS is fatuous to say the least - let's just leave aside the fact that you can get it from a member of the opposite sex who's either:
ReplyDelete1) had sex with someone (possibly of the opposite sex) who has HIV/AIDS;
2) injected a HIV-infected needle; or
3) born from someone who had HIV/AIDS.
That's right - someone as straight as you can also be carrying HIV/AIDS, by virtue of the three categories above.
Yet even a homosexual individual who practices safe sex, is tested and found to be HIV NEGATIVE (no HIV) is banned from giving blood?
But let's not let logic get in the way of a homophobic rant though, shall we? If nothing else, the only perversion I can see here is your perverse bigotry that belongs back in the Dark Ages, not 2011.
By the way, if I ever have to choose between either taking donated blood from you or bleeding to death, I'll take bleeding to death, thanks.
I really pity you. You should not be allowed to call yourself Politician.
ReplyDeleteAren't you lucky to live in a country where you can say hateful thing and not be punished for it. God bless democracy.
ReplyDeleteI really pity you. I feel that you would live a much happier and fulfilled life if you just let go and accept that discrimination is pointless. Sadly my friend, you've lived a too sheltered life to really understand what it is you are saying.
ReplyDeleteYou're probably a closet homosexual yourself which is why you have such strong feelings about homosexuality. Perhaps you think too much, or are unfulfilled and frustrated.
I beg you to open your mind and see the real world. There's a bigger world out there I promise you. Perhaps go travelling, speak to more people and create a wider understanding of the world.
I wish you all the best in your quest for better understanding.
Kind regards,
Lizzie Graham
I find your opinions and you rather revolting and I would hate to think of you giving blood as you seem poisoned with hatred. Infact I look at you and think what a perverted individual!
ReplyDeleteOh man... I'm not sure you're prepared for the epic shitstorm that's about to engulf you. I almost feel a bit sorry for you. Well, I would - if you weren't a total idiot.
ReplyDelete"As all right-thinking men know, we are sexually compatible with women - we are not sexually compatible with other men"
ReplyDeleteThis statement is incorrect. Men are sexually compatible with both genders, as are women; this has been proven due to the many gay people who enjoy a healthy sex life, with same sex partners.
You are clearly a very unintelligent man, blinded by your own unjustifiable hate. If you decided to use your brain and think logically, you may realise you are wrong.
Not only that, but heterosexual people often engage in anal sex or licking of the anus; it is not an exclusively homosexual activity. Likewise, many homosexual people do not engage in those activities, yet you still 'disagree' with homosexuality as a whole.
I suggest you stop being extremely ignorant and start to learn more about sexuality; perhaps, then, you will realise that homosexuality directly causes absolutely no harm and homosexual people deserve to be treated as completely equal to their heterosexual peers.
Richard, where is the love?
You are possibly the worst example of a human being I have come across. Evil is the only word that springs to mind. Your evil.
ReplyDelete"As all right-thinking men know, we are sexually compatible with women - we are not sexually compatible with other men"
ReplyDeleteAre you aware of the Kinsey Scale? I think you should read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale
I wouldn't normally cite wikipedia yet I think you probably need the simplified version.
And are you aware that 70% of animals frequently engage in sexually activities with their gender. Humans are homosapiens meaning, we too are animals, therefore sexual flexibility is in our biological make-up.
As for your other comments, I am not going to dignify them with a response
Fuck You Richard
ReplyDeleteYou seem very well versed in the activities of gay men. It's always the ones who shout the loudest who have the most to hide. Why don't you just come out. You'll probably find that you're a lot less angry.
ReplyDeleteThe lady doth protest too much
ReplyDeleteI take great comfort in knowing that the vast majority of sensible minded British people do not and will never agree with your hateful views. You represent all that is wrong with Christianity in the modern world, you don't take the time to research or understand those who you attack. I would bet that you don't want to either. As a gay man I can categorically say that I have never had a sexually transmitted disease and nor do I have HIV or AIDS. You are of course entitled to your opinion, it's just a shame that no one wants to hear them, so why not just keep them to yourself
ReplyDeleteI must say, sir, you are absolutely bonkers. When did you choose to be straight? Did you awaken one morning and say "Dear me, I think I will become straight today!" and commence an interest in women?
ReplyDeleteI would post a tirade in response to this post, but I beleive it would fall upon deaf ears.
Your a fucking idiot
ReplyDeleteWow, it's hard to believe -- and a shame -- that there are still such intolerant, narrow-minded and ignorant people as you in Britain!
ReplyDeleteYes, the children are at risk because you can 'catch' homosexuality, right?
ReplyDeleteI was with you up until I realised that you think being gay is a choice.
Wow! That was hot. Would you be interested in bumming sometime? I'm not even gay but that got me so freaking HOT for your sexified opinions.
ReplyDeleteRichard Carcrash.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting blog post.As a heterosexual-pervert I am left wondering a few things
ReplyDelete1) Where can I get the medical statistics to back up your point
"Given that homosexual-perverts are generally riddled with disease - from HIV to syphilis to hepatitis etc -"
2) Can you clarify the health risk Mr Stephton poses to his young charges as a primary teacher. I am confused about that point. Indeed I am confused about many of the points made in this blog post.
3) Just a warning to you. Ann from over the road told me not only could you catch AIDS but also GAY from following gays on Twitter. I feel it's only fair to warn you.
I'm looking forward to reading your answers to my questions.
All the best
homosexual-pervert with a vagina which has had a penis in it and mouth which has on occasion also housed a penis
Claire
What I can't understand are the many 'straight' Christian priests who have sex with young boys.. is that perversion?
ReplyDeleteI've found there are plenty of straight perverts, so I think the homosexuals are allowed a few too?
Hi Richard, just thought I'd pop in to say that I remember when your way of thinking and your way of expressing your thoughts would not have been thought remarkably bigoted.
ReplyDeleteI'm fortunate to have lived long enough to see a comprehensive change of attitude towards homosexuality throughout Britain, and when I read articles like yours I feel happy that such opinions are no longer commonly held or expressed.
You are a twisted evil person.
ReplyDeleteI have indulged in all sorts of oral and anal perversions with men, and I give blood. Don't really see why it's different just because I'm a woman.
ReplyDeleteCan you please point to where the NBS have said lifting the ban "could result in a fivefold increase in the risk of HIV-infected blood entering the blood supply"? I'd like to examine their evidence for that.
How can you really in this day and age think like that? As long as he is happy what the hell should it matter to you. Hopefully one day you will get the help you need for your poison filled mind. I'm not a conservative but I support this man's and many other people's idea. Every year people die because of a lack of blood for transfusions. Imagine how many people could be saved. All that would be needed is a simple test of the person donating blood. I can't give blood either because I am under 7st 12lbs, is that rightful discrimination as well. I would love nothing more than to give blood and save a life but I can't so I know how he feels. Thankfully the barrier stopping me I can pass but this is his life and you have no right to wish him 'cured'. Do you know why because there is nothing wrong with being gay, he isn't poisonous, all he happens to be is a man who is attracted to men rather than women and I think that is brilliant because he can be happy rather than denying it and living his life in a depressed state. I wish him all the best. You however, I wish for you to seek help with your terrible point of view before it really hurts someone you know and love.
ReplyDeleteI fancy you.
ReplyDeleteYou are an idiot
ReplyDeleteYou're an utter twat.
ReplyDeleteI think you're the one that needs help. The things you write on this blog are horrific, and make me feel phsyically sick. The thought that anyone could actually write such bile is beyond me.
ReplyDeleteIf two men are in love, and want to get married, then let them! If two women are in love, and want to get married, then let them! The only real difference between a man and a woman are their reproductive systems. The only real difference is that they won't be able to have children.
Love is love, whatever your gender. If you're against homosexuality, you're against people being in love. And that's just sad.
Wow, for someone who thinks homosexuality to be a form of perversion, you seem awfully fascinated by it. Eleven posts on the subject in the last six months!
ReplyDeleteWow you're a cunt. ... No criticism or attempt at argument, I dont it'd be worth my time trying. But ... wow.
ReplyDeleteWhat a ridiculous and bigoted rant.
ReplyDeleteThe ban on men who have had sex with other men is totally outdated. Today I could walk into a clinic and get a result to see if my blood tested HIV positive within minutes. The screening process for infected blood has come on in leaps and bounds, and today the chances of infected blood slipping through the net is practically zero.
More than this, the ban is totally discriminatory. HIV can take up to three months to show up in a blood sample. So women who have had sex with someone in a high-risk category need to wait six months before they can give blood, to give any infection ample time to register. But a man who has had sex with another man is banned for LIFE. Huge swathes of the population are thus excluded from giving blood, including infection-free, monogomous gay couples, straight men who have had a random experimental 'encounter', and gay men who, for one reason or another, have not had sex at all in months.
If gay men are deemed a high-risk group, then why not stipulate that men cannot give blood if they have had sex with a man in the last year? That gives ample time for any infection to register. Yes, no system is flawless and there will always be the odd infected donation which slips through the net, but weigh this against the numbers of people who desperately need blood.
Or perhaps we should take this is as a vote of confidence on the NHS's part that our blood banks are so stocked to the gills that they can afford to be so picky?
I can only see that this ban continues due to people with backward and jaw-droppingly bigoted views such as yours. Matthew Sephton is indeed a man, and he is no less so for being gay. Homosexuality is not a 'lifestyle choice' any more than being left-handed is. And if you were truly concerned for Matthew Sephton's welfare, you would wish him well and apologise for publically slinging around exactly the sort of ignorant and homophobic rubbish that can all-too-often make the lives of gay men a trial, which should have no place at all in a 21st century Britain, much less the political forum.
I sincerely hope that one day you are involved in a horrific accident or are struck down by a terminal disease that requires organ donation and the only available organs are from a gay man.
ReplyDeleteWell, I never thought I'd be on the side of a Tory, but this rather stunning display of unwarranted hatred puts me there. Find it hard to believe educated people still think like this. Very sad
ReplyDeleteYou, sir, are a vile chauvinist and a reptile. And, before you unleash your illogical views on me, I am a heterosexual with 2 kids and a lovely wife. I just don't appreciate bigots using the internet as a form of machismo, gay-bashing.
ReplyDeleteYes, the rule of not allowing gays to donate blood is there to protect the receivers of donated blood, but to insinuate that every homosexual that partook in the act of anal or oral sex is "contaminated" is fiction at best.
Also, the statement "...taking another man's penis into his mouth (and vice versa) at least once" also suggests that you would bar any man who has received oral sex from a woman, and women who have performed said act from giving blood also.
And also, regarding the wish for Matthew to "... accept and embrace the fact that he is a man, along with all the implications of his male gender" is a condemnation of a persons free will, and a little something called human rights.
"a homosexual-pervert is banned from donating blood if he has ever engaged in anal or oral perversion activity with another man".
ReplyDeleteI think you will find that the site in question does not use the term 'pervert' at all.
For someone who claims to find homosexual sexual acts abhorrent, you seem to relish writing about them.
ReplyDelete'Richard Carvath is a British political activist and a member of the CCF.'
ReplyDeleteAnd clearly a total bigotted idiot.
"he has engaged in buggery, and/or licking of another man's anus and/or taking another man's penis into his mouth (and vice versa) at least once."
ReplyDeleteIs anyone else here really aroused?
The only person who needs help is you - you need help to understand that homosexual is not synonymous with 'pervert', and that rates of HIV infection are actually higher in heterosexual people these days.
ReplyDeleteThis isn't the eighties, and only the least informed and most pathetic excuses for political commentators are still peddling these lies and ignorance about gay individuals.
Also, only cowards screen their comments. The point of a blog is open discussion. If you can't stand criticism, don't air your views in public.
ReplyDeleteThank you for saying this - it is so important that people should know what you stand for in your political activism.
ReplyDeleteMay you reap what you sow.
Ha ha ha. Very funny. This is a spoof blog, yes? This is a collection of satirical scribblings to lampoon conservative views? It's very well observed - I almost believed you really were an unbelievably ignorant and crass homophobic buffoon. Well done, well done!
ReplyDeleteRichard, I just I thought I'd let you know of a spelling mistake on your blog's banner. It looks like you put british political activist when I think you meant to put bigoted homophobic cock. Other than that, sterling work, keep it up.
ReplyDelete"Under the National Blood Service's current guidelines, a homosexual-pervert is banned from donating blood if he has ever engaged in anal or oral perversion activity with another man."
ReplyDeleteSo why aren't heterosexual perverts banned if they've had anal sex with a woman who's been engaging in anal sex with all sorts of other people and animals and what have you?
And why are hetersexual non-perverts who always use condoms banned?
Given that it would be madness to use donated blood without first testing it for HIV and all sorts of other things, why on earth would you engage in blanket vetting of any would be donors?
I can't believe that someone who claims to be a Christian can write this. You might not approve of another's lifestyle. Deliberately insulting a person so publicly is disgraceful. Have you heard of repentance, forgiveness, love your neighbour as yourself. As a committed follower of Christ I find this article outrageous. You could make your point without naming names, without calling someone names and be more effective. The truth is your point is completely drowned by your vitriolic tirade.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKnND2D31eI
ReplyDeleteWhat he said^^^
So I assume you are also opposed to any women who have indulged in fallatio ever giving blood? Or men who have engaged in anal sex with a woman? You do know that blood is tested before it is transfused, right?
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry you are so intimidated by homosexuality and hope you can get the psychological help you seem to need to help you stop being an interfering busy body and bigot.
Please tell me this is just really bad satire. If so, work on your technique a bit, it's a bit unclear if you're joking or not. If you're not joking, please kill yourself. No, seriously, do it now. You're a piece of shit on the toilet paper of the world and you should be flushed away to the sewers where you belong. And remember, cut down, not across.
ReplyDeleteWow, you're hot. Are you a top or a bottom?
ReplyDeleteIs a woman prevented from donating blood if she has engaged in oral or anal sex with a man? If not, should she be?
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeleteYour account of homosexual sex is very descriptive. Any reason for this?
I stopped reading when you said 'homosexual pervert.'
ReplyDeleteIt's very much in the public interest that people like you never get to represent us in Government. I won't lose any sleep over it though because you've made yourself completely unelectable
You really are a vile creature.
You seem like a health risk to me. Is that herpes on your lip? You are such an idiot, seriously. Get help.
ReplyDeleteHi Everybody,
ReplyDeleteMy apology for the delay in publishing your comments; I'm very busy this month. Well, what can I say?.....
I'm afraid I simply don't have the time to respond in detail to so many comments; clearly this was a bombardment of this blog co-ordinated via Twitter in the first instance.
The key points I want to make are as follows:
(1) The above comments are clear evidence which prove that it's the militant homosexuals and their supporters who are consumed by hatred and depravity - not evangelical Christians like myself.
(2) I renounce every curse and evil word written and spoken about me here and elsewhere in the name of Jesus.
(3) Though you are enemies, I want you to know that I love all of you and I hope and pray that all of you will be delivered from your evil, hatred and depravity.
(4) Human beings are not animals; we are created in the image of God.
(5) Human beings are heterosexual by nature; 'homosexuals' are simply heterosexual human beings in need of healing. 'Homosexuals' with the will to go straight successfully return to normal human sexual attitudes and behaviour when they get the help they need - and that help is out there.
(6) Homosexual behaviour is a perversion.
(7) The defining characteristic of the homosexual lifestyle for most of its participants is rampant promiscuity (and hence all the disease).
(8) Race should not be confused with perversion behaviour. Race is fixed at conception; race is innate; it is wrong to discriminate on grounds of race. Being 'gay' is a lifestyle choice to engage in perverted behaviour; nobody is born gay; it is right to discriminate against evil, depraved and harmful behaviour.
(9) The indisputable facts about the public health disaster that is homosexuality are readily available and easy to find on the internet: search for yourself.
(10) I'm a normal heterosexual man; always have been, always will be.
(11) True sex can only take place between a man and a woman, and the best setting for sex is between a husband and wife committed to each other in marriage.
(12) My views are mainstream views as shared by billions of other people on this planet.